Blue Pill-Red Pill-Your Choice

Little man

JFK Assassination 1963—President of the United States publicly executed.

Blue Pill

Disgruntled, ex-Marine. and Russian sympathizer Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone and shot JFK.

Red Pill

Hitmen were set to kill Kennedy in Chicago and Tampa days before the Dallas shooting. Oswald was a government asset. Rogue CIA operatives together with Mafia hitmen and Cuban rebels fired the shots that killed JFK as part of a carefully planned and executed coup. Afterward, the government issued a bogus report, fabricated and modified evidence including the presidential limo, autopsy photos and JFK’s body, and put a news-damper on the public discussion for 54 years. Unknown parties killed dozens of witnesses and independent investigators to silence them. The motives for the JFK killing range from Lyndon Johnson’s need to become president, warmongers seeking to attack Cuba, stopping JFK’s peace program, JFK’s desire to expose the truth about space aliens, stopping JFK from continuing printing new government (non-Federal Reserve notes), to promote a war in Vietnam and many others. 

USS Liberty Attack 1967—United States Navy spy ship attacked for many hours by Israeli fighter planes and torpedo boats. 34 of the crew killed and 171 wounded.

Blue Pill

The Israeli pilots and crews mistakenly identified the USS Liberty as an Egyptian warship. It was just a terrible mistake.

Red Pill

The ship was attacked purposely to create an international incident which would provide cover for Israeli activities in the 1967 Six Day War. The US government was aware of the attack but provide no assistance to its own ship. A bigger Red Pill leads one to believe that President Lyndon Johnson ordered a nuclear strike on Cairo in support of the Israelis, but the plane was called back at the last minute by white hats. 

9-11 2001—The destruction of the World Trade Twin Towers and Building 7 and the murder of 3,000 people.

Blue Pill

19 Arab men hijacked four commercial passenger jets and flew them into the World Trade buildings and the Pentagon. The last plane crashed landed in a farm field in Pennsylvania.  The Muslin extremist attackers executed their hateful act per President Bush “because they hate our freedoms.” The US retaliated with a war in Afghanistan which was allegedly a stronghold for Muslim terrorists. Years later the United States attacked Iraq with the implication that Saddam Hussein was a dangerous person who held weapons of mass destruction and who had some oblique connection to the 9-11 attacks.  This war was enlarged to become a PermaWar backing “freedom fighters” and insurrectionists in many countries in the Mideast.

Red Pill

The attack on the World Trade Center was a Neocon “New Pearl Harbor” intended to shock the American people into a “War Against Terrorism” and to coerce them to give up their basic constitutional rights. The attack was directed by Vice President Cheney from the bunker in the White House. The Twin Towers and Building 7 did not fall because of the airplane strikes but rather were imploded. The Pentagon building was struck by a missile, not a plane. Afghanistan returned to its role as a major opium producer. Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.

There are dozens of other examples of Blue Pill/Red Pill choices available to the people of America: Sandy Hook, Las Vegas shootings, Oklahoma City bombing, The Gulf of Tonkin attack, the deaths of Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy, the impeachment of President Nixon,  the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan, the murder of Seth Rich, the operation of the Clinton Foundation, etc.

Most people choose to take the Blue Pill rather than the Red Pill. It is easier to digest and initially less painful. It requires no thinking. As a matter of fact, thinking about the Blue Pill official explanations will only lead a person to sample a Red Pill. But now we have reached the point where many people have taken the Red Pill. There is no turning back for those people. There is only an undying quest for truth. Take the Red Pill and save the world.

For a new daily dose of Bill Pill visit these sites.  CNN  Washington Post

For a new daily dose of Red Pill visit these sites. Here’s Your Red Pill

 

Who Do You Trust?

bhitler-bush

Who do you trust to provide truthful news? The New York Times, The National Enquirer, your favorite YouTube site, CNN, FOX News, or “none of the above”? Getting a handle on reality has become more challenging now that more possible realities are surfacing. It was so much easier when people relied on the Mockingbird system and its predecessors. Of course, that ease of decision-making sucked us into WWI and WWII, Vietnam, the “War on Terror” and many other negative realities. In five years, we may look back on the present era fondly, at least from the point of view of seeing the “truth”. At the moment, various truths are competing for our attention. One approach is to remain interested and attentive, but detached and skeptical. Filter reality and build your own “truth.” Here is a guest post about “truth” from one of my characters, Emma Neumann from my novel Saving Trump.

“The well-known story of All the President’s Men written by Washington Post reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward chronicled the exploits of these two reporters during the early 1970s Watergate scandal. The book was a classic David and Goliath tale of the bulldog reporters using inside information, in this case from a mysterious source called ‘Deep Throat,’ to investigate and break the big story which would ultimately take down President Richard Nixon.

Let’s fast forward from 1972: Nixon was re-elected President of the United States; Vice-President Agnew resigned (1973); Gerald Ford became Vice-President (1973); Nixon resigned as President after the Watergate scandal (1974); Ford became President (1974); Nelson Rockefeller became Vice-President (1974).  History books covering this era must be action-packed, exciting reads.

Then in 1975-76, the Church Committee investigated United States intelligence activities, and Operation Mockingbird was exposed. Begun in 1953, Mockingbird was a CIA program which used legitimate news sources to influence domestic public opinion. Brand-name reporters working for the New York Herald Tribune, Newsweek, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and others were allegedly subject to control by their CIA Mockingbird masters. Other reporters, not working within the propaganda system, were wire-tapped to determine content. Basically, it was a continuing propaganda campaign running within, and capable of manipulating, the revered ‘Fourth Estate,’ the news media.

More recently we have the story of the leader of Amazon, Jeff Bezos, buying The Washington Post newspaper in 2013 for $250 million. Earlier in the same year, Bezos’ company Amazon received a $600 million contract to provide cloud services to the CIA. The Washington Post has been a constant source of negative information about President Trump, much of which has been obtained from anonymous sources.

Logically, one might assume that the truth once exposed would negate any propaganda efforts by the CIA or anyone else. Of course, Edward Bernays, the father of modern-day public relations or propaganda, said in his 1927 report entitled The Minority Rules that “the most effective propaganda, indeed, is that which enlarges and presents the truth so that an indifferent public will understand it and accept it.” Later in the same article, he says that if propaganda “strays into untruth, the course of events will show it up, and its power will end.”

But, what is the truth?

Some definitions state that a verified fact conforming to reality, and not false (untrue) is the truth.

And what is a lie?

A lie is an idea or statement that is untrue but which is presented as if it was true.

It could be said that all reported news may or may not be true depending on verification of the facts and the honesty of the reporter. Like the quantum physics question: is it a particle or a wave?, determining whether it is the truth or a lie depends on your filter and interpretation.

Hitler had a method of establishing the truth. The Nazi propaganda leaders said that if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, it will become the truth. This is the problem with public relations and propaganda. It is a process which establishes the truth and then sells it to the public. In effect, it is ‘fake news.’ Because news reporting is not only a fact-reporting machine, it is a fact-filter or lens.  It diminishes or magnifies any event according to the bias of the source. Or in some cases, news is totally or partially fabricated.

Is the CIA still in the business of manipulating domestic and foreign public opinion? Are the Russians involved in manipulating domestic and foreign public opinion?  Is President Trump doing the same? Are the Democrats and Republicans doing the same? The easy answer is, yes. Is all the news presented on television, and in newspapers, magazines, movies, podcasts, videos, websites and word-of-mouth the “truth”? Or is it some form of propaganda? The answer is that it is all propaganda. From instantaneous electronic reporting to time-delayed historical reporting, it is all the same. Let the reader beware.

In the very near future, it will be reported that the Russians co-opted Facebook, Google and other sites that offered advertisements along with their information and news. Most likely their intent was to disrupt the elections. Maybe they were just testing the concept to determine the best way to influence our elections. The Russians will be exposed for buying ads which promoted specific candidates and issues in the 2016 Presidential Election. Possibly Donald Trump was one of those promoted. If so, does that mean he colluded with the Russians? Or does it reflect on the transmitter of the news, Facebook or Google? Are they in some capitalistic, business-like way colluding with the Russians? Or is this all about free-speech for everyone including foreign intelligence operations?

Mockingbird news survives. It will never be killed by the truth because the truth is an imaginary bullet.”

History is a Rearview Mirror

Lonely 1

History is a rearview mirror which should bear the inscription “Caution: The world may appear different than it is.” In fact, history is just another propaganda tool of the Controllers. The history of the world is a distilled, fabricated, massaged and distorted presentation of facts, lies, and opinions. It may take the form of a high school or college text,  a television series, or of a written, spoken or video news analysis. The official history is sold every minute of every day to the sleepy-eyed, over-worked populace.

“Black and white” presentations of the “facts” surrounding wars, assassinations, economic depressions, plagues, natural disasters, governments, religions, leaders, and losers tell simple stories. The bad guys are identified and hung out to dry; the good guys canonized. An event happened, a reaction followed, etc.

But you might want to test the development of the official history.  Try this little exercise. Take stock of the last decade or two. Remember the historical events as they happened. Double check and supplement your memory with newspapers, videos, and other immediate contemporary accounts of events as they happened. Skip the news analysis articles that fill news magazines like Time. These articles are the first stage of the history packaging process. Imagine sheep herded into pens by dogs. That is their purpose. The Controllers want to lead you down the official path of “truth.”

You might also want to follow the propaganda process from news bulletins to headlines, to articles, to weekly summations, to annual reviews, to cinematic dramatizations, to Ken Burns-type television presentations, to fiction and non-fictional books by well-known authors and finally to the very boring and dogmatic writings presented in official history texts.

Pick a historical event which seems important to you, one that should appear in a history book, like 911, the Iraq invasion, or the financial crisis of 2007-2008. Then grab a history text used to teach high school students today.

Make an analysis of the summation and causation of events that happened in your lifetime. See if you agree with history’s version. Can you see the filtering, editorializing, and the congealing of facts to fit the official story? My time travel books are all written from this viewpoint. This little exercise may make you doubt the historical fairy tales describing all those other historical events which happened before you were born.

Predicting the Future

War-or-Peace

In March 1934 Capt. Eddie Rickenbacker, race car driver, future president of Eastern Airlines, World War I flying ace and Medal of Honor recipient, wrote an article for Foreign Service magazine entitled “War or Peace”. The image above is from that article. The caption reads: “vultures of destruction…controlled by robots…operated by radio and television.” The cartoon predicts and depicts today’s military drone operations. Rickenbacker’s pre-World War II anti-war article, written by a man who had experienced modern war first-hand, is deadly accurate.

“The next war…will be a world war. But it will be unlike any other war that we know of. There will be no noncombatants. The battle front, roughly, will be the face of the earth. The roof of one’s own house, one’s own back yard, each will be part of the battle front. The combatants will be all living things.”

In some detail, he describes the horrors of the coming war. “These vultures of destruction, many—probably most of them—controlled by robots, will fly far behind the lines of advancing men, there to drop bombs weighing tons, the explosion of which will shake the average city as would an earthquake, causing buildings far from the scene of the explosion to tremble, crack, then crumble to the ground, crushing human souls to death, burying thousands there alive.”

But, after accurately predicting all the horrors of the next war, especially today’s euphemistically called “collateral damage”, he goes on to say that he does not believe there will be another war stating that “in the future if there is a war, no one can win but death.”

Capt. Rickenbacker was a great prognosticator of the future of military technology but a poor judge of the sensibility of humanity and the strange affection our political leaders have for creating unending war.